Products & Accessories
Applications & Customer Care
Search - Contactenhanced_search
Case Studies
Turner Blog
Products & Updates
General Information
Contacts
Content Categories
Content Sections
Please note, our office will be closed November 24th & 25th for the Thanksgiving holiday. We will re-open for regular business on Monday, Nov. 27th. Please feel free to send us messages during this time and we will respond upon our return.

Knysna Basin Project Utilizes C6 Multi-Sensor Platform with Chlorophyll and Turbidity Sensors

Application(s)

In Vivo Chlorophyll, Turbidity

Introduction
Rhodes University Field Station is an adjunct of the Department of Zoology and Entomology. The University Department has made considerable advances in estuarine and oceanic studies over many years that have appeared in international peer reviewed journals. It is sited in the coastal town of Knysna, 400 km west of the university in Grahamstown. Estuarine research as such was initiated during my tenure as Professor and Head of the Department from 1963. Following my retirement in 1988 I set up the field laboratory to encourage graduate students and scientists to continue work on the water column, macroinvertebrates and saltmarshes of the Knysna estuary (34 04 46 S :: 23 03 29 E). The website gives some indication of the issues we consider important and the persons working on them.

Marine Embayment, Knysna estuary 

Issue/Concern Being Addressed
Early investigations of chlorophyll pigments in the water column of tidal estuaries in South Africa are reported by Lucas (1986) for the Great Fish River estuary, Allanson and Reed (1995) for the Kariega River estuary, and Grange and Allanson (1995) in the Great Fish River estuary. These studies provided clues as to what were the significant drivers in the pattern both spatially and seasonally in chlorophyll variation (see also Litaker et al. 1987; Wetz et al. 2006 and Cloern et al. 2010). Their development was directed to understanding the role of freshwater flow into the estuary and the consequences of long periods of zero flow, (Perissinotto 2010, Vorwerk et al. 2008, Snow and Adams 2005, Muir and Perissinotto 2011, Kotsedi et al. 2012). All of these studies assessed chlorophyll a distribution using grab water samples collected spatially over a period of time, usually a diurnal tidal cycle, and repeated seasonally. However, with the introduction of submersible digitally recording instruments such as the Turner Designs C3 or C6 Multi–Sensor Platform attached to Cyclops-7 sensors – one for chlorophyll and the second for turbidity (NTU), it is possible to visualise the links that occur between chlorophyll a and proximate factors such as temperature, turbidity and water depth continuously or over short time intervals during a tidal cycle or other changes, for example, river flow, Smith (2008). This paper reports the early findings arising from the deployment of a Turner Designs C6 platform equipped with chlorophyll and turbidity sensors at two stations in the marine embayment of the Knysna River estuary [34°:04’:46’’S 23°:03’:29’’E], (Figure 1) during the summer of 2012.

Installation and Sampling Protocol
Calibration of the fluorometer followed the methods described by Turner Designs (2012) C-Soft Windows™ User Interface. Calibration begins with a blanking step in which the fluorometer is placed in glass-fibre filtered seawater and when the ‘Current RFU’ readings have stabilized, the instrument is set to blank. All further measures will be subtracted using this value. The fluorometer is then placed in solutions of known chlorophyll concentration (mg/l) and turbidity measured in nephelometric units (NTU). In this investigation a 2 L sample of seawater was collected at the site of the deployment and 1 litre filtered (GFC) and the filter content extracted in cold 90% acetone in the dark overnight, transferred to a centrifuge tube, stoppered, and left in the dark until centrifuged, (Aminot and Rey (2000). After centrifugation chlorophyll a was determined using a GBC UV-Visible Cintra 101 digital spectrophotometer. The concentration of chlorophyll is entered into the ‘Standard Value’ box in the ‘Calibration Screen’ and the remaining steps completed. The C6 platform is similarly calibrated for turbidity as NTU in which the turbidity of the water sample after blanking is measured using a standard nephelometric meter (Eutech Instruments TN-100/T-100) and the NTU value introduced via the ‘Calibration Screen’ during the calibration procedure. Time to start of the measurements in situ is chosen and the instrument deployed.  View presentation for more information.

Turner Designs submersible fluorometer: left hand downloading data mode; right hand submersible mode with battery pack in place

Summary
It is too early to talk about successes, other than to record that a paper was presented at the 49 Meeting of the Southern African Society of Aquatic Scientists in July of this year. Considerable interest was shown by a number of workers at the meeting.

Once the software has been worked through, the instrument is easy to use,but we have to be careful that dates and times are given in accordance with the C6 requirements. I mention this as we tend to use the British format of day-month-year.

Acknowledgements
Our thanks are due to:
Barloworld
Rhodes University
Marine remote sensing unit
SANhydro tides Tokai, Cape Town
MRSU 2012
Joclyn Fearon
Neil Hart, Oceanography, University of Cape Town

References
Allanson B R and G H L Reed (1995). Further comment on the response of south east coast estuaries to variable freshwater inflows. Southern African Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 21: 56-71.

Aminot  A and F Rey (2000). Standard procedure for the determination of chlorophyll a by spectroscopic methods. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Denmark.

Cloern,J E and A D Jassby (2010). Patterns and Scales of phytoplankton variability in estuarine-coastal ecosystems Estuairne and Coasts, 33: 230 - 241

Grange  N  and B R  Allanson (1995). The influence of freshwater inflow on the nature, amount and distribution of seston in estuaries of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, 40:403 - 420

Litaker W., C S Duke, B E Kenney, and J Ramus  (1987). Short-term variability and phytoplankton abundance in a shallow tidal estuary. Marine Biology, 96: 115 – 121.

Lucas, A B (1986). The distribution of chlorophyll pigments in relation to cyclic, sporadic and episodic events in the Great Fish River estuary, MSc thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.

Marine Remote Sensing Unit (2012) http://www.afro-sea.org.za.
 
Muir D G and R.Perissionotto (2011). Persistent phytoplankton bloom in Lake St Lucia (iSimangaliso) South Africa.  Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77: 5888 – 5896.

Roegner G C and  A L Shanks (2001). Import of coastally-derived chlorophyll a to South Slough, Oregon. Estuaries, 24:244  256.

Smith J G (2008) Water column characterisation using a C3 submersible fluorometer. Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Monterey, CA. USA.  www.Turnerdesigns.com/case studies C3

Kotsedi, D, J B Adams and G C Snow (2012). The response of micfroalgal niomass and community composition to environmental factors in the Sudays Estuary. Water SA, 38:177-189.

Snow G C and J B Adams (2005). Response of micro-algae in the Kromme Estuary to managed freshwater inputs. Water SA, 32: 71-80.

Turner Designs (2012). C6 multi-Sensor Platform: User’s manual. Turner Designs 845 W. Maude ave. Sunnyvale, CA 94085, USA.

Vorwerk P D, P W Froneman, A Paterson,N A Strydom and A K Whitfield (2008). Biological responses to resumption in river flow in a freshwater – deprived, permanently open southern African estuary. Water SA, 34 online 1816 – 7950.

Contact

  • Author: Brian Allanson, Inga Chinnery
  • E-Mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Location

South Africa
Rhodes University Field Station, Knysna